It is beginning to appear to me that this isn't going to be
resolvable because it may be by design, but it is a huge issue. It
may even be big enough that our organization may re-think our
decision to use this technology as a CMS.
I'm curious how others are handling this issue in a Content
Management scenario?
If users setup an doc library to store the appropriate images for
their site, it is common practice to organize those images into sub
folders. Otherwise, it would be an awfully big mess. It is also
probable that the users of a particular site (or sub site) would want
to set custom permissions on those sub folders so only the
appropriate people could edit the images contained in them, but,
anonymous site visitors could see the images when called from the
HTML in the content page.
I find it tough to believe that we'd be the only organization
wrestling with this issue, especially since the MCMS to MOSS
migration process created these sub directories to mirror the
resources structure in our MCMS installation with unique folder
permissions to match. Any page that uses any image in any of those
sub folders is not anonymously accessable. This in effect, has
broken the entire site. Could MS engineers really have overlooked
such a big issue?
Can anyone shed some light on a work around or solution here? Does
anyone know if anonymous access can be set programmatically?